'Nazi Opposition and the Holocaust\r'

'In â€Å"underground and Resistance in national socialist Germany”, Frank McDonough explains that the Christian church was the only organization in Hitler’s Germany that opposed Nazism.  For this reason, the church was vehemently opposed by Hitler for Nazi opposition.  The chief opponents of Nazism within the Church were punished by the Nazis.  Nevertheless, the Church refused to bow to the Nazi regime seeing as the values of the Church differed widely from Nazism.\r\nSamuel P. and Peral M. Oliner write in â€Å"The Holocaust: Problems and Perspectives of Interpretations” that in that location were around 50,000 to 500,000 non-Jews with altruistic personalities that came to rescue the Jews during World war II.  Although the period was marked by extreme violence and bloodshed, reliable was meant to overcome evil in the class of countless slew that risked their lives for the Jews, despite the detail that they were non related to the Jews by r eligion, culture, or ethnicity.\r\nPeter convert mentions several such people by report in his article, â€Å"Lessons and Legacies: The Meaning of the Holocaust in a Changing World.”  According to the author, although the Nazis believed that it was a crime to patron the Jews, the insolent people who helped the Jews refused to submit to Nazi wring and injustice.\r\nAnalysis\r\nAll of the articles summarized above result evince to back up the authors’ theses.  While Frank McDonough provides historic examples of the conflict between the Church and Nazism; Samuel P. and Peral M. Oliner provide research evidence to show the altruistic characteristics of the brave non-Jewish rescuers that came to help the Jews without expecting a monetary reward in exchange for their help.  Peter Hayes uses the case body of work method to describe the altruistic personality of the non-Jewish rescuer.\r\nHence, solely triad articles provide enough information for the sourc e to understand the respective topics in depth.  What is more, all three articles present information in a lucid manner.  After introducing the topics of their articles, the authors present evidence to support their thesis, connecting for each one of their sentences and paragraphs to the previous ones.  At no point does it expect that the authors are digressing or providing little in cost of reasoning.  Rather, the articles are complete in terms of logic.\r\n person-to-person Response to the Readings\r\nIn my opinion, the most important fact to infer from the summarized readings is that smashing and evil can be interwoven in time in terms in great distress.  Indeed, it is good news for humanity that everybody would not submit to evil despite all odds.  So, til now though the Nazis were a great threat for the good people in their area, innumerable such people refused to be afraid of Nazism, and instead made an safari to help the Jews.  The Church refus ed to bow to Nazi authoritarianism to boot.  I believe this is a victory for religion, even if the Jews were being persecuted because of their religion alone.  Indeed, my faith in the magnate of religion as well as good over evil has been strengthened through these readings.\r\n \r\n \r\n'