Singapore Essay examples -- Philosophy, Neoliberal Ideology

In a sense, capital of Singapore has always been driven by neoliberal ideology. In the 1960s and 1970s, Singapores economic fight was based upon its ability to generate low-cost manufacturing assembly, its political stability, and geographical location (Yeung, 2000 142). However, by the 1980s, Singapore was being outcompeted by other developing Asian countries, and met this competitiveness crunch with guinea pig strategies promoting high-tech avocation services (Yeung, 2000 142). blind drunk infocomm programmes were enacted as early as 1980, the IDA maintained sustained drives to promote and rise their citizens regarding ICTs. As a result of the National IT Plan (1986-1991), computer package and services fabrication increased its revenue 10-fold, the ICT workforce pool grew from 850 to 5,500, and the IT business and e-commerce continued to expand through subsequent programmes (iN2015 Steering Committee, 2006 33). In 2006, Singapore boasted the highest ratio of infocomm-relate d patents to total patents in the world, and the iN2015 Steering Committee attributed this success to the national ICT programmes (2006 36).More than ever, Singapore is a consumer-driven country with a prosperous economy. The infocomm initiatives purposefully drove the economy forward by encouraging business to encrypt the e-economy and by persuading consumers this was safe and convenient. With the specific aim of encouraging national and transnational companies to set up e-commerce trading centres in Singapore, the Singaporean government introduced the okay Cyber Traders scheme which entitled qualifying firms to pay less corporate tax (Teo, 2002 259). A highly sophisticated electronic payment infrastructure further both vendors and consumers t... ...d safeguard against fraud and theft if a strong e-commerce industry is to be fostered. Are ICTs in Singapore being used as instruments of image, and how much are they being utilised as facilitators of open republic? Democracy re lies heavily on a free press, but as Brown points out, this is compromised by neoliberalist corporate ownerships and laws shielding political officials from defamation (2006 695). This is genuine of Singapore today. The state controls the broadcast media that is friendly to the government, and defamation suits dissuade journalists from publishing contentious political pieces (OHara, 2008 10). In Singapore, the media coverage of political opposition has vast been suppressed, primarily under the justification of national interest, an ideology of control that has driven the nations policy on media control (Lee and Willnat, 2006 10).